Considerations for an information audit
Jinfo Blog
12th June 2012
Abstract
There is no standardised model for an information audit. However components will generally include planning, surveying, inventorying existing resources, performing a gap analysis, valuing existing resources, and outlining recommendations. Every information audit will involve a number of decision points and the direction chosen can ultimately affect the outcome.
Item
While the phrase "information audit" has risen and fallen in popularity, the need has remained steady if not grown. Most enterprises can benefit from an information audit, looking closely at how workers acquire, store, locate, share and use information. Done well, the process will identify opportunities to increase information access, save time, save money or some combination of the three.
There is no standard model for an information audit. Components will generally include planning, surveying, inventorying existing resources, performing a gap analysis, valuing existing resources, and outlining recommendations. Every information audit will involve a number of decision points, and the direction chosen can ultimately affect the outcome.
One such decision will centre on who should actually conduct the audit. Librarians and information professionals are particularly well-suited to the task and should consider offering this as a valuable service to their organisation either directly or through a third party. Sometimes it works well to bring in an outside consultant for the process, particularly if there is no resident information professional or if he/she does not have the time or expertise.
There is another less obvious reason to consider bringing in an outside consultant, and it is actually a credit to the organisation’s information professional. An information audit typically involves surveys and interviews designed to gain an understanding of how stakeholders obtain, share, and use information within the organisation. Engaging a third party to conduct these interviews can improve candour on the part of the responders and therefore enhance reliability of the findings. Some responders do not want to appear critical or unappreciative of the existing library or knowledge management function, particularly if the resident info pro is well=liked. Thus, they hesitate to offer a candid assessment of their situation. Sometimes people find it easier to share their concerns or criticisms with an outsider.
A successful information audit will add value and maximise return on investments while increasing access to organisational knowledge.
- Blog post title: Considerations for an information audit
- Link to this page
- View printable version
- Maximise your return on information investments with an information audit
Tuesday, 12th June 2012
- Information management lessons from "Austin Powers" [ABSTRACT]
Tuesday, 1st March 2011 - SharePoint 2010: Changing the paradigm with a business-oriented approach to records management [ABSTRACT]
Sunday, 4th July 2010 - FUMSI Report Excerpt: Preparing and planning an audit
Sunday, 30th September 2007
Vendor adoption of AI
Community session
23rd May 2024
AI prompting and AI-sourcing, US private companies, and Jinfo on YouTube
Blog posting
10th April 2024
April 2024 Update
YouTube video
10th April 2024
- AI prompting and AI-sourcing, US private companies, and Jinfo on YouTube
10th April 2024 - AI practical actions, prompting and outsourcing
6th March 2024 - GenAI and ESG wisdom of the Jinfo crowd
13th February 2024
- Jinfo Community session (TBC) (Community) 20th June 2024
- Vendor adoption of AI (Community) 23rd May 2024
- Offshore, outsource or AI-source? (Community) 16th April 2024