Value metrics pricing: Pricing based on basic multiples
Jinfo Blog
3rd April 2012
Abstract
The first of three approaches to pricing is what we call "value metrics" and tends to be the simplest. Even if there are a number of variables that go into the metric (e.g., numbers of readers versus in-depth users, different content sets, different delivery mechanisms), the fundamental approach comes down to A x B = Price. Learn which levers to pull when negotiating over value metrics.
Item
This is the second in a four-part series of FreePint Features on how vendors of content products invest in product development. If you influence or negotiate contracts, you may find this approach to understanding the various levers you can pull to be useful.
---
With a value metrics pricing philosophy, contract values are generally a multiple of users or seats, the amount of content supplied, and (sometimes) the inclusion of different product features such as a certain number of custom alerts or use of widgets.
The key investments that support this pricing philosophy are content creation or acquisition and robust, reliable features. Many vendors that use value metrics for pricing aggregate content from a variety of sources, and they have to focus on assembling a strong set of content from sources their customers want at a reasonable price.
These sources are at risk for losing content – something that has happened all too often in the past two years, as publishers have begun to pull their content out of aggregators to try to monetise it independently.
Many of these vendors also have incorporated content from social media and blogs; they also face risk and costs with this web-based content, because of the inconsistent nature of so much web content. A value metrics vendor with a decent-sized web-based content set may need to test and repair tens of thousands of URLs every month to meet appropriate customer demands for reliability.
In negotiations, buyers need to understand the underlying costs the vendor takes on in order to supply the product. The revenues vendors generate must be shared with other publishers in the case of licensed data, and the fixed costs of skilled developers and product managers are significant.
For few seats or users, there is often very little room for concessions on price. At larger numbers of seats or users, however, account managers may have more flexibility in adapting to buyer budgets.
Four-part series:
- Part 1: introduction
- Part 2: value metrics
- Part 3: delivery framework
- Part 4: consultative
Learn more about FreePint Research's benchmarking projects and request information about participating.
- Blog post title: Value metrics pricing: Pricing based on basic multiples
- Link to this page
- View printable version
- Consultative pricing: It's all about expertise
Thursday, 5th April 2012 - Delivery framework pricing: Understanding the workflow
Wednesday, 4th April 2012 - Defining value through pricing
Tuesday, 3rd April 2012
Offshore, outsource or AI-source?
Community session
16th April 2024
AI practical actions, prompting and outsourcing
Blog posting
6th March 2024
AI practical actions, prompting and outsourcing
YouTube video
13th March 2024
- AI practical actions, prompting and outsourcing
6th March 2024 - GenAI and ESG wisdom of the Jinfo crowd
13th February 2024 - Talking to vendors, talking to buyers (ESG, GenAI and YouTube)
10th January 2024
- Jinfo Community session (TBC) (Community) 15th May 2024
- Offshore, outsource or AI-source? (Community) 16th April 2024
- The art of crafting AI prompts (Community) 26th March 2024