WikiLeaks 2: How many more?
Jinfo Blog
15th December 2010
Item
Amid the furore about the WikiLeaks diplomatic cables thereâs one possibility that doesnât seem to have been much considered yet: that WikiLeaks may have blown it. Whether it has or not, there are still likely to be plenty of imitators which information managers are going to have to keep an eye on. Already, a key WikiLeaks staff member Daniel Domscheit-Berg has quit to set up a rival group following an internal row, paidContent:UK reports (http://digbig.com/5bdcgn). The article also refers to a list of more than 100 further groups releasing sensitive data, compiled by another WikiLeaks founder John Young, who runs his own leaks website Cryptome (http://cryptome.org). Now VIPâs sister publication Resourceshelf has highlighted two more aspiring leakers. OpenLeaks will not publish directly but will receive and anonymise information; and Brussels Leaks is apparently the creation of disaffected former Eurocrats dedicated to exposing âdodgy dealingsâ in Europe (http://web.resourceshelf.com/go/resourceblog/62550) Brussels Leaks (http://brusselsleaks.com) has a few pages up but doesnât appear to offer any bootleg documents yet, while at the time of writing OpenLeaks (http://www.openleaks.org) is just one web page with a large logo and the simple message: âComing soonâ. Meanwhile the Russian news agency RIA Novosty reports that the blogger and journalist Alexei Navalny, who has apparently made repeated calls for greater transparency in Russian business practices, has created his own whistleblowing site modelled on WikiLeaks (http://www.rospil.info), although it too is only operating in test mode at the moment (http://digbig.com/5bdcgq). Until this year, few people had heard the name of WikiLeaksâ leader Julian Assange; when the organisation was first formed, the identities of the people behind it were â perhaps justifiably â kept secret (http://www.vivavip.com/go/e3). Since then itâs been on a roller coaster ride, almost ceasing operations earlier this year because of shortage of funds (http://www.vivavip.com/go/e27868) and possibly contemplating a wholesale move of its operations from Sweden to Iceland if that country continues on its path of reinventing itself as a haven for free speech (http://www.vivavip.com/go/e29698). We had a hint of the Assange abrasiveness last year when a bad tempered WikiLeaks editorial lambasted Twitterers for claiming the credit in the Trafigura toxic waste dumping scandal (http://www.vivavip.com/go/e25813). Now, finally, he may have done WikiLeaks a critical disservice by âbecoming the storyâ â and opened up opportunities for imitators and rivals as a result. If any of these do eventually start delivering properly, thereâs no guarantee that theyâll be stable sources of intelligence; Cryptome for example claims to be attacked âseveral times a dayâ, usually by bots (http://digbig.com/5bdcgp). So merely keeping track of them will be just one of many new challenges for information managers concerned with due diligence, competitor analysis or simple damage limitation â and itâs still unclear how prepared companies are to meet the threat.About this article
- Blog post title: WikiLeaks 2: How many more?
- Link to this page
- View printable version
What's new at Jinfo?
Register for our next Community session:
![]()
Transforming knowledge management at BASF – GenAI and the evolution of QKnows
10th December 2025
Latest on our YouTube channel:![]()
Read on the Blog:
December 2025 update
3rd December 2025
- Jinfo wins CILIP’s inaugural “McFarlane & Ward Information Management” award
4th December 2025 - December 2025 update
3rd December 2025 - Review of Matchplat – combining AI with traditional industry code searching
27th November 2025
- Team roles and AI (Community) 26th February 2026
- Team demand and AI (Community) 22nd January 2026
- Transforming knowledge management at BASF – GenAI and the evolution of QKnows (Community) 10th December 2025
Learn more about the Jinfo Subscription